Read My Mind!

Hmmm iI'm not sure if that assessment is correct Mr Glover... technically to travel back and forth between two specific times could have catastrophic effects. One time would be ok. To do so several times would cause a lapse in universal memory .. or mass consciousness memory recording the event. I reccommend having it annually so that we dont create a hole in space-time. :-)

UUhhh, yeah, why in the hell are you going to MIT to figure out how to hold a freaking time travel convention? Why spend all that money, going to an expensive ass school, just to talk about the "possibility" of time travel, when IT'S NOT POSSIBLE? ANY person can say that they are time travelers, all they would have to do is show up, and tell you, "I'm from the future, and this is how things are in the future." And then go into a seemingly real scenario whereupon they explain future events that have yet to happen. BUT HOW DO THEY KNOW HOW THINGS ARE GONNA BE IN THE FUTURE? They DON'T know, because the future hasn't happened yet. I know that alot of people will say, "But what about there being more than one timeline that other people exist on?" What about it? There are no other timelines that other people exist on. If you ask me, which you didn't, but if you did, I would say that this all sounds like a group of people's inability to want to deal with reality, to want to deal with how things really are around them, so they go off and hold a stupid ass convention and talk about "time travel", and how it is possible for this to happen. SERIOUSLY, you have all been watching the Back To The Future trilogies WAAAAY too much. Next you're gonna tell me that you actually DID make a car that can go either back or forward into time, provided that the car is going fast enough, because, after all, speed is the huge differential when dealing with time travel. And of course, you also have to have some sort of major energy catalyst to aid in the ability of this car to travel back or forward into time, such as a "flux capicitor". Why don't you call Doc Brown up and get him right on that venture, seeing as how this "time travel" is possible and all? "Hmmm I'm not sure if that assessment is correct Mr Glover... technically to travel back and forth between two specific times could have catastrophic effects. One time would be ok. To do so several times would cause a lapse in universal memory .. or mass consciousness memory recording the event. I reccommend having it annually so that we dont create a hole in space-time." GIVE ME A FREAKING BREAK!!! To travel back and forth between two different times could have catastrophic effects? WHAT effects? A breakdown in your nerd-dom? Some form of "future virus"? So if I were to somehow be able to travel back and forth between two specific times, it would cause a lapse in universal memory, or mass consciousness memory recording the event? WHAT THE FUCK DOES THAT MEAN? A lapse in universal memory? Mass consciousness memory recording the event? SERIOUSLY, get a MAJOR grip on reality. Unless you can give me REAL and TRUE and DOCUMENTED proof that you somehow have figured out a way to time travel, you WILL NOT CONVINCE ME. This WHOLE thing is stupid and pointless, and a waste of your time and money. I say YOUR time and money because I'm not wasting MY time or money on ANY of this. What a fucking joke, and here I thought that people who went to MIT were SUPPOSED to be smart, and highly educated, but apparently, all that alot of you MIT "geniouses" are doing is making sure that there won't be a hole in the space-time continuum. OMFG.